This Public NOTICE is in an attempt for United States government’s transparent corresponding accountability in United States v. Marino, CR-97-40009-NMG. (D.Mass); Marino v. Dep’t of Justice, et al., civil action #12-cv-865-RMC. (Washington, D.C.2012); Marino v. U.S. Attorney’s Office District of Massachusetts, et al., civil action #12-cv-872-RMC. (Washington, D.C.2012). FOR THE RECORD.
Intentional violations of Brady discovery rule, from egregious misconduct, from due process violations,Facilitating “Contempt of Court” and their knowingly, willfully and intentionally concealing the facts that Vincent Marino is held 14 years over term of imprisonment concerning Four separate issues and 16 years over concerning one issue?,as both of Marino’s lawsuits proves, his actually, factually andlegally innocent of the June 16th, 1989 Salemme attempted murder depicted as predicate racketeering Act A-2 in Count One RICO and Count Two RICO conspiracy via: United States v. Marino, CR-97-40009-NMG. (District of Massachusetts/Boston/Worcester)
There is a reasonable and actual probability of a different result such as: had the above discovery been handed over to the Federal grand jury Marino WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN INDICTED for the Salemme attempted murder, Judge: Nathaniel M.Gorton would not have given Marino 24 years and 2 month enhancement for the Salemme attempted murder, and Marino would not be held 14 years over in Federal prison unlawfully and unconstitutionally. The result of the Proceeding would have been much more favorable to Marino had the above concealed discovery been handed over to Marino .
Forth coming Marino’s Trial Transcripts showing egregious governmental and judicial misconduct which Project Marino was designed to disseminate this information to the Public for Public opinion, government transparency and potential legislation from the governmental Reform Committee in both Houses, the Senate and House of Representatives designed for Checks and Balances: Legislative, Judicial, Executive Branches of Government.
As the United States Department of Justice , et al., and its components were NOTIFIED via:
- Marino v. Department of Justice , et al., civil action #12-cv-865-RMC. (District of Columbia, Washington, 2012) lawsuit, and failed to even respond to it, as they were properly served certified mail on June 12, 15, 18, 2012.
Moreover, according to Marino v. United States Attorneys Office District of Massachusetts, et al., civil action #12-cv-872-RMC. (District of Columbia, Washington, 2012) Marino also served via: CERTIFIED MAIL the Department of Justice and its components this lawsuit whom the Department of Justice also failed to timely and properly respond served on June 12, 15, 18, 2012.
It appears that the United States Department of Justice components:
- U.S. Attorney Generals Office District of Columbia; U.S.
- Attorneys Office District of Massachusetts;Office of Information Policy/
- Department of Justice; Office of Enforcement Operations/
U.S. Attorneys Office District of Columbia; Executive Office of the United States Attorneys United States Department of Justice are ALL IN CONTEMPT OF COURT, and should be received heavy monetary sanctions and CONTEMPT of COURT violations,
since Marino is unlawfully held 14 years over on four separate issues and 16 years over in prison on one issue depicted in both lawsuits that were intentionally ignored by the Department of Justice‘s attorneys and their agency’s, supra.
THIS INFORMATION IS GOING PUBLIC VIA: PROJECT MARINO, so that PUBLIC opinion is generated so that the people may know what their (United States- government is up to) World-Wide.