Before you discredit the information your about to read.We encourage you to research R.F.I.D chipping If you Can not find your own information here are some informative sites to help pick your brain:
Vincent M. Marino was apprehended on December 15, 1996 at Logan International Airport,East Boston Massachusetts: Defendant’s , Jonn Gammel,FBI Agent, Damien Farley, DEA Agent, Anthony Roberto,DEA Agent, Vincent Kelly,DEA Agent,Norman Peterson, DEA Agent, Joseph Desmon, DEA Agent, Michael Cuniff, DEA Agent, James Soiles, DEA Agent, Thomas Quiglui,Massachusetts State Police, John and Jane Does, took part in the arrest of Marino .
While Marino was in the custody of agents, Marino was approached by DEA AGENT ROBERTO, who attempted to gain Marino’s authorization and
signature on a document.The document was purporting to be an “authorization” for the surgical removal of an electronic device from Marino’s body.DEA AGENT ROBERTO, informed Marino he had been implanted with an “a microchip tracking device” and law enforcement (Drug Enforcement Agency/Federal Bureau Investigation) had been tracing Plaintiff since on or about November 25, 1996.
ROBERTO, further stated to Marino that it was on “on
loan” to Drug Enforcement Agency from the Central Intelligence Agency
(C.I.A.) and was a sophisticated state of the art piece of equipment,
cost a lot of money. Must be returned to the CIA. ROBERTO, assured Marino that he would be released on bail if would sign documents and
consent to surgical removal of device. Marino refused to sign the consent forms.
stated “Nobody will ever believe we did this”.
Marino was transported from Logan International Airport to the
Drug Enforcement Agency’s New England Field Division Office (Field
Office) in Boston, Massachusetts.While being transported from the Logan International Airport tothe field office, Defendant’s FARLEY, and QUIGLEY, continued to enticePlaintiff to consent to the surgical removal of the Micro Chip Tracking device.
VINCENT MICHAEL MARINO, a/k/a Vincent Michael Portalla, Plaintiff
JOHN GAMMEL, FBI Agent, DAMIEN FARLEY, DEA Agent, ANTHONY ROBERTO, DEA Agent, VINCENT KELLY, DEA Agent, NORMAN PETERSON, DEA Agent, JOSEPH DESMOND, DEA Agent, MICHAEL CUNIFF, DEA Agent, JAMES SOILES, DEA,Agent, THOMAS QUIGLEY, Massachusetts State Police, and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-20, Defendants
Marino presents independently corroborated irrefutable medical, technological, court, documentations which supports his claims, however his proof was either concealed, impeded, of propagandized from reaching the general public, by the culpable defendants cited in Marino v. CIA, et al., civil action #11-cv-813-RMC. (Washington, D.C.2011) which is NOW pending in the District of Columbia United States District Court.
- See United States v. Jones, U.S., No. 10-1259, January 23, 2012. Placing Global Positioning Systems (GPS) Devices in a persons vehicle or cell phone intrudes on a persons 4th Amendment Right to be secure in their? persons or property according to the United States Supreme Court. It appears that the governments surgical implantation of numerous GPS tracking & or listening devices would be held to a much higher standard than a vehicle & or cell phone. See Marino v. Central Intelligence Agency, et al., civil action #11-cv-813-RMC. (Washington, D.C. 2011); also see Maynard, in which the District of Columbia Circuit court was affirmed by the United States Supreme Court on the same issue.
- “Let us remind you Vincent Marino is an American born Citizen, Born on May 11,1961 in Boston Massachusetts entitling Mr.Marino citizenship so by chipping his civil rights were violated on public record. as American citizens this should fear us all, we are nothing more then expandable numbers to the ones who control the system”.
Defendants GAMMEL, FARLEY, ROBERTO, KELLY, PETERSON, DESMOND,
CUNIFF, SOILES, QUIGLEY and several JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES.See also Marino v. Gammel, 191 F.Supp.2d 243 (D.Mass.2002); Marino v. Massachusetts General Hospital, et al., civil action #99-5655-H. Suffolk Superior Court Boston, Massachusetts.
Vincent Michael Marino (aka) Vincent Michael Portalla Plantiff,
Massachusetts General Hospital M.D’s:Defendants
Civil Acton Number:99-5655H et al., (Jury trial demanded )
- Ralph Lounsburry Warren ,M.D.;
- James H. Balcom ,M.D.;
- Edward Gorge ,M.D.;
- Patrick Jackson ,M.D.;
- Holley Macdonald ,R.N;
Marino always contended that the defendants/agencies/government implanted him with numerous electronic (GPS) devices in his brain and body on November 24, 1996 while Marino was under general anesthesia for a “ruse” laparoscopic exploratory surgery and bullet removal at the Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts WITHOUT MARINO’s valid consent and WITHOUT A VALID COURT WARRANT. hence, THE DEFENDANTS egregious misconduct and documents supporting thereof must be handed over to Marino and the PUBLIC as this case has generated a substantial PUBLIC INTEREST and is in the PUBLIC DOMAIN and PUBLIC RECORD, thus cannot logically be classified as TOP SECRET,? the government did not block the United States v. Jones, case from the public why would they block the Marino v. CIA, et al., case from receiving documents which would support its criminal conduct in covertly implanting Marino with the devices? As the PUBLIC RECORDS REFLECT.
- This was done WITHOUT MARINO’s valid consent and WITHOUT A VALID COURT WARRANT.
Keep in mind that the NSA, classified the “PROJECT MARINO” under Executive Order as “TOP SECRET” and also stated to a United States District Court Judge that if the NSA, CIA, et al., hands over the documents Marino seeks that it may cause exceptional grave damage to the National Security of the United States?
That appears to be interesting since the NSA’s ECHELON Satellite Communications Intelligence technologies are in the PUBLIC DOMAIN, PUBLIC RECORD. Logically, the (SIGINT) Signal Intelligence techonologies connected to the government’s covert surgical under GENERAL ANESTHESIA implanted devices in Marino’s brain and body on November 24, 1996, at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, without Marino’s valid consent and without a valid court warrant should be made public for public discussion and to hold the government to be accountable for their egregious historic and current misconduct.
Plaintiff’s? motion request under FED.R.CIV.RULE15: Plaintiff Marino’s request to supplement his reply in opposition to Defendants motion to Dismiss/summary Judgment and supplement Marino”s motion for summary Judgment against Defendants supporting that Defendants:NSA, CIA, NGA, FILED Declarations in BAD FAITH Intentionally , Misleading the Court that the Technologies concerning the defendant’s –Covert surgical Implantation of Numerous Devices IN Marino’s Brain and Body while under General Anesthesia at MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL,BOSTON, On NOVEMBER 24,1996 WITHOUT HIS VALID CONSENT and WITHOUT A VALID COURT? WARRANT AS THE TECHNOLOGIES ARE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.Publicly known information that MARINO is Implanted with Electronic devices in MARINO’S Body Since NOVEMBER 26,1996 TO? CURRENT DATE 2013
WHO IMPLANTED MARINO ? DEFENDANTS /AGENCIES DARPA,NASA,CIA,NSA,NRO,FBI, DEA,MSP,MGH PARTNERS HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS INC &OTHERS BOTH KNOWN AND UNKNOWN GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS. Marino presents independently corroborated irrefutable medical, technological, court, documentations which supports his claims, however his proof was either concealed, impeded, of propagandized from reaching the general public, by the culpable defendants cited in Marino v. CIA, et al., civil action #11-cv-813-RMC. (Washington, D.C.2011) which is NOW pending in the District of Columbia United States District CourtWarrant.
- See United States v. Jones, U.S., No. 10-1259, January 23, 2012. Placing Global Positioning Systems (GPS) Devices in a persons vehicle or cell phone intrudes on a persons 4th Amendment Right to be secure in their? persons or property according to the United States Supreme Court. It appears that the governments surgical implantation of numerous GPS tracking & or listening devices would be held to a much higher standard than a vehicle and or cell phone.
- See Marino v. Central Intelligence Agency, et al.,civil action #11-cv-813-RMC. (Washington, D.C. 2011); also see Maynard, in which the District of Columbia Circuit court was affirmed by the United States Supreme Court on the same issue.It appears that the above is of a “Substantial Public Interest” requiring governmental transparency & should be both national & international news for public discussion. We would like Transparent Corresponding Accountability AS THE TECHNOLOGIES ARE IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN.